| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
20 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Neglecting the porosity of hot-star winds can lead to an underestimation
of mass-loss rates | L. M. Oskinova
; W.-R. Hamann
; A. Feldmeier
; | Date: |
18 Apr 2007 | Subject: | Astrophysics (astro-ph) | Abstract: | Adequate stellar atmosphere models are required for spectral analyses and
mass-loss determinations of massive stars. Present models account for the
inhomogeneity of stellar winds only in the approximation of small-scale
optically thin clumps. Compared to previous homogeneous models, this treatment
has led to a reduction of empirical mass-loss rates by factors of two to three,
and even further reductions are presently discussed. We generalized the Potsdam
Wolf-Rayet (PoWR) model atmosphere code in the ``formal integral’’ in order to
account for clumps which are not necessarily optically thin . The stellar wind
is characterized by the filling factor of the dense clumps, and by their
average separation. Adopting a statistical distribution of clumps, an effective
opacity is obtained and applied for the radiative transfer. Our model shows
that wind porosity has a pronounced effect on the emergent spectrum. Modeling
for the O-type supergiant Zeta Puppis reveals that the optically thin H_alpha
line is not affected by wind porosity, but the PV resonance doublet becomes
significantly weaker when porosity is taken into account. In the case of
Wolf-Rayet stars we demonstrate for two representative models that stronger
lines are typically reduced by a factor of two in intensity, while very weak
lines remain unchanged by porosity effects with a plausible choice of the
clump-separation parameter. Therefore, in the case of Zeta Puppis, the reported
discrepancies between resonance-line and recombination-line diagnostics can be
entirely resolved with the models which include wind porosity, without a
downward revision of the mass-loss rate. As porosity effect reduces the
strength of spectral features, its neglection hitherto in stellar wind modeling
has potentially led to an underestimation of empirical mass-loss rates. | Source: | arXiv, arxiv.0704.2390 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |