|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609
25 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
The Kinematic Evolution of Strong MgII Absorbers | | Andrew C. Mshar
; Jane C. Charlton
; Ryan S. Lynch
; Chris Churchill
; Tae-Sun Kim
; | | Date: |
4 Jun 2007 | | Abstract: | We consider the evolution of strong (W_r(2796) > 0.3A) MgII absorbers, most
of which are closely related to luminous galaxies. Using 20 high resolution
quasar spectra from the VLT/UVES public archive, we examine 33 strong MgII
absorbers in the redshift range 0.3 < z < 2.5. We compare and supplement this
sample with 23 strong MgII absorbers at 0.4 < z < 1.4 observed previously with
HIRES/Keck. We find that neither equivalent width nor kinematic spread (the
optical depth weighted second moment of velocity) of MgII2796 evolve. However,
the kinematic spread is sensitive to the highest velocity component, and
therefore not as sensitive to additional weak components at intermediate
velocities relative to the profile center. The fraction of absorbing pixels
within the full velocity range of the system does show a trend of decreasing
with decreasing redshift. Most high redshift systems (14/20) exhibit absorption
over the entire system velocity range, which differs from the result for low
redshift systems (18/36) at the 95% level. This leads to a smaller number of
separate subsystems for high redshift systems because weak absorping components
tend to connect the stronger regions of absorption. We hypothesize that low
redshift MgII profiles are more likely to represent well formed galaxies, many
of which have kinematics consistent with a disk/halo structure. High redshift
MgII profiles are more likely to show evidence of complex protogalactic
structures, with multiple accretion or outflow events. Although these results
are derived from measurements of gas kinematics, they are consistent with
hierarchical galaxy formation evidenced by deep galaxy surveys. | | Source: | arXiv, arxiv.0706.0515 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER