Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3643
Articles: 2'487'895
Articles rated: 2609

28 March 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0110492

 Article overview


Morphological Classification of Galaxies Using Artificial Neural Networks
Nicholas M. Ball ;
Date 22 Oct 2001
Subject astro-ph
AbstractThe results of morphological galaxy classifications performed by humans and by automated methods are compared. In particular, a comparison is made between the eyeball classifications of 454 galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) commissioning data (Shimasaku et al. 2001) with those of supervised artificial neural network programs constructed using the MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox package. Networks in this package have not previously been used for galaxy classification. It is found that simple neural networks are able to improve on the results of linear classifiers, giving correlation coefficients of the order of 0.8 +/- 0.1, compared with those of around 0.7 +/- 0.1 for linear classifiers. The networks are trained using the resilient backpropagation algorithm, which, to the author’s knowledge, has not been specifically used in the galaxy classification literature. The galaxy parameters used and the network architecture are both important, and in particular the galaxy concentration index, a measure of the concentration of light towards the centre of the galaxy, is the most significant parameter. Simple networks are briefly applied to 29,429 galaxies with redshifts from the SDSS Early Data Release. They give an approximate ratio of types E/S0:Sp:Irr of 14 +/- 5 : 86 +/- 12 : 0 +/- 0.1, which broadly agrees with the well known approximate ratios of 20:80:1 observed at low redshift.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0110492
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica