|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3657
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609
14 October 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
The electronic specific heat in the pairing pseudogap regime | | C. P. Moca
; B. Janko
; | | Rating: | Members:  2.66/5 (1 reader) | | Date: |
9 May 2001 | | Subject: | Superconductivity; Strongly Correlated Electrons | cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el | | Abstract: | When pairing correlations in a quasi two dimensional electron system induce a pseudogap in the single particle density of states, the specific heat must also contain a sizeable pair contribution. The theoretically calculated specific heat for such a system is compared to the experimental results of Loram and his collaborators for underdoped YBa_2Cu_3O_{6+x} and La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_4 samples. The size and doping dependence of the extracted pseudogap energy scale for both materials is comparable to the values obtained from a variety of other experiments. | | Source: | arXiv, cond-mat/0105202 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
1 review found:
(To access fulltext of a review, click on titles below.)
1. Science-advisor.net review 05090030 (3 readers) 
Rate this comment. |  | | | Review title: |
is it possible to consider the phase transition together with the pseudogap? | | Reviewer: |
reviewer20 | | Date: |
29 September 2005 at 13:12 GMT. | | Comment: | The most interesting thing in this article is the fact that electronic specific heat from single particles cannot reproduce the wide hump between Tc and T*. The hump can be reproduced very well by a pairing contribution. The doping dependence is correct when fitting experiments. However, the main problem is that there is no superconducting phase transition at Tc. The sharp peak at Tc is not reproduced.
Maybe this model could be improved by introducing considering the phase transition together with pairing fluctuations.
|
|
browser CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
|
| |
|
|
|
REGISTER