Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'503'724
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0201282

 Article overview


The bright Gamma-Ray Burst of February 10, 2000: a case study of an optically dark GRB
L. Piro ; D. A. Frail ; J.Gorosabel ; G. Garmire ; P. Soffitta ; L. Amati ; M.I. Andersen ; L. A. Antonelli ; E.Berger ; F. Frontera ; J. Fynbo ; G. Gandolfi ; M.R. Garcia ; J. Hjorth ; J. in ’t Zand ; B.L. Jensen ; N.Masetti ; P. Möller ; H. Pedersen ; E. Pian ; M. H. Wieringa ;
Date 17 Dec 2001
Journal Astrophys.J. 577 (2002) 680-690
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationIASF/CNR, Roma), D. A. Frail (NRAO), J.Gorosabel (DSRI), G. Garmire (Penn State Univ.), P. Soffitta (IASF/CNR, Roma), L. Amati (IASF/CNR, Bologna), M.I. Andersen (Oulu Univ.), L. A. Antonelli (OaR/INAF), E.Berger (Cal. Tech.), F. Frontera (Univ. Ferrar
AbstractThe gamma-ray burst GRB000210 had the highest gamma-ray peak flux of any event localized by BeppoSAX as yet but it did not have a detected optical afterglow. It is therefore one of the events recently classified as dark GRBs or GHOST (GRB Hiding Optical Source Transient), whose origin is still unclear. Chandra observations allowed us to localize this GRB within ~1" and a radio transient was detected with the VLA. We identify the likely (P=0.01) host galaxy of this burst at z=0.846. The X-ray spectrum of the afterglow shows intrinsic absorption N_H=5x10**21 cm-2. The amount of dust needed to absorb the optical flux of this object is consistent with the above HI column density, given a dust-to-gas ratio similar to that of our Galaxy. We do not find evidence for a partially ionized absorber expected if the absorption takes place in a Giant Molecular Cloud. We therefore conclude that either the gas is local to the GRB, but is condensed in small-scale high-density (n>~10**9 cm-3) clouds, or that the GRB is located in a dusty, gas-rich region of the galaxy. Finally, if GRB000210 lies at z>5, its X-ray absorbing medium would have to be substantially different from that observed in GRBs with optical afterglows.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0201282
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica