Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » hep-ph/0202001

 Article overview



Present and Future Electroweak Precision Measurements and the Indirect Determination of the Mass of the Higgs Boson
U. Baur ; R. Clare ; A. Denner ; J.L. Diaz Cruz ; S. Dittmaier ; J. Erler ; M. Gruenewald ; S. Heinemeyer ; U. Heintz ; M. Kraemer ; H.E. Logan ; K. Monig ; M. Narain ; M. Roth ; M. Schmitt ; D. Wackeroth ; G. Weiglein ; D.R. Wood ; J. Wudka ;
Date 1 Feb 2002
Journal eConf C010630 (2001) P1WG1
Subject hep-ph
AbstractWe discuss the experimental and theoretical uncertainties on precision electroweak observables and their relationship to the indirect constraints on the Higgs-boson mass, $MH$, in the Standard Model (SM). The critical experimental measurements ($MW$, $sweff$, $mt$, ...) are evaluated in terms of their present uncertainties and their prospects for improved precision at future colliders, and their contribution to the constraints on $MH$. In addition, the current uncertainties of the theoretical predictions for $MW$ and $sweff$ due to missing higher order corrections are estimated and expectations and necessary theoretical improvements for future colliders are explored. The constraints from rare B decays are also discussed. Analysis of the present experimental and theoretical precisions yield a current upper bound on $MH$ of $sim 200$ GeV. Including anticipated improvements corresponding to the prospective situation at future colliders (Tevatron Run II, LHC, LC/GigaZ), we find a relative precision of about 25% to 8% (or better) is achievable in the indirect determination of $MH$.
Source arXiv, hep-ph/0202001
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica