Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'501'711
Articles rated: 2609

20 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1010.2299

 Article overview


On the fairness of the main galaxy sample of SDSS
Kelai Meng ; Bin Ma ; Jun Pan ; Longlong Feng ;
Date 12 Oct 2010
AbstractIn order to measure fairness of the main galaxy sample of SDSS, series of flux-limited and volume-limited samples are constructed from SDSS data releases DR4, DR6 and DR7 for analysis with various statistics: two-point correlation functions $xi(s)$ and monopole of three-point correlation functions $zeta_0$ in redshift space, projected two-point correlation function $w_p$ and pairwise velocity dispersion $sigma_{12}$. We find that with the expansion of sky coverage of SDSS, $xi(s)$ of flux-limited sample is extremely robust against sample volume change and insensitive to local structures at low redshift. For volume-limited samples, $xi(s)$ of SDSS DR7 in luminosity bins brighter than $-M_{r,0.1}=[17,18]$ are in good agreement with earlier data releases at scales $s< sim 10hmpc$, while at larger scales the consistency is broken for samples dimmer than $L^*$, the deviation of DR7 to DR6 and DR4 grows with larger absolute magnitude. Volume-limited samples of SDSS display convergence in $zeta_0$ at scales $s<sim 10hmpc$ except the one in the faintest luminosity bin, but in the weakly nonlinear regime, there is no agreement between $zeta_0$ of different data releases in all luminosity bins. $w_p$ of volume-limited samples in luminosity bins brighter than $-M_{r,0.1}=[18.5,19.5]$ are robust against data version, while for samples in dimmer bins, $w_p$ of DR7 are significantly larger. $sigma_{12}$ of the two faintest volume-limited samples also show much steeper scale dependence in DR7 and then become flatter at higher luminosity...
Source arXiv, 1010.2299
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica