Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1101.4952

 Article overview



Geometric and Dynamical Models of Reverberation Mapping Data
Anna Pancoast ; Brendon J. Brewer ; Tommaso Treu ;
Date 25 Jan 2011
AbstractWe present a general method to analyze reverberation mapping data that provides both estimates for the black hole mass and for the geometry and dynamics of the broad line region (BLR) in active galactic nuclei (AGN). Our method directly infers the spatial and velocity distribution of the BLR from the data, allowing us to easily derive a velocity-resolved transfer function and allowing for a self-consistent estimate of the black hole mass without a virial coefficient. We obtain estimates and reasonable uncertainties of the BLR model parameters by implementing a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm using the formalism of Bayesian probability theory. We use Gaussian Processes to interpolate the the continuum light curve data and create mock light curves that can be fitted to the data. We test our method by creating simulated reverberation mapping data-sets with known true parameter values and by trying to recover these parameter values using our models. We are able to recover the parameters with realistic uncertainties that depend upon the variability of the AGN and the quality of the reverberation mapping campaign. With a geometry model we can recover the mean radius of the BLR to within ~0.1dex random uncertainty for simulated data with an integrated line flux uncertainty of 1.5%, while with a dynamical model we can recover the black hole mass and the mean radius to within ~0.05dex random uncertainty, for simulated data with a line profile average signal to noise ratio of 4 per spectral pixel. These uncertainties do not include modeling errors, which are likely to be present in the analysis of real data, and should therefore be considered as lower limits to the accuracy of the method.
Source arXiv, 1101.4952
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica