| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3643 Articles: 2'487'895 Articles rated: 2609
29 March 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Dust and the type II-Plateau supernova 2004dj | Peter Meikle
; Rubina Kotak
; Duncan Farrah
; Seppo Mattila
; Schuyler D. van Dyk
; Anja C. Andersen
; Rob Fesen
; Alex V. Filippenko
; Ryan J. Foley
; Claes Fransson
; Christopher L. Gerardy
; Peter A. Hoeflich
; Peter Lundqvist
; Monica Pozzo
; Jesper Sollerman
; J. Craig Wheeler
; | Date: |
15 Mar 2011 | Abstract: | We present mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy of a Type II-plateau supernova, SN
2004dj, obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope, spanning 106--1393 d after
explosion. MIR photometry plus optical/near-IR observations are also reported.
An early-time MIR excess is attributed to emission from non-silicate dust
formed within a cool dense shell (CDS). Most of the CDS dust condensed between
50 d and 165 d, reaching a mass of 0.3 x 10^{-5} Msun. Throughout the
observations much of the longer wavelength (>10 microns) part of the continuum
is explained as an IR echo from interstellar dust. The MIR excess strengthened
at later times. We show that this was due to thermal emission from warm,
non-silicate dust formed in the ejecta. Using optical/near-IR line-profiles and
the MIR continua, we show that the dust was distributed as a disk whose radius
appeared to be slowly shrinking. The disk radius may correspond to a grain
destruction zone caused by a reverse shock which also heated the dust. The
dust-disk lay nearly face-on, had high opacities in the optical/near-IR
regions, but remained optically thin in the MIR over much of the period
studied. Assuming a uniform dust density, the ejecta dust mass by 996 d was 0.5
+/- 0.1) x 10^{-4} Msun, and exceeded 10^{-4}Msun by 1393 d. For a dust density
rising toward the center the limit is higher. Nevertheless, this study suggests
that the amount of freshly-synthesized dust in the SN 2004dj ejecta is
consistent with that found from previous studies, and adds further weight to
the claim that such events could not have been major contributors to the cosmic
dust budget. | Source: | arXiv, 1103.2885 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser claudebot
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |