Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

26 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1110.2310

 Article overview



Galaxy cluster number count data constraints on dark energy
L. Campanelli ; G.L. Fogli ; T. Kahniashvili ; A. Marrone ; Bharat Ratra ;
Date 11 Oct 2011
AbstractWe use data on massive galaxy clusters (M_cluster > 8 10^14 h^(-1) M_solar within a comoving radius of R_cluster = 1.5 h^(-1)Mpc) in the redshift range 0.05 < z < 0.83 to place constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameters (w_0,w_a), as well as on the nonrelativistic matter density parameter Omega_m, on the amplitude of mass fluctuations sigma_8, on the index n of the power-law spectrum of the density perturbations, and on the Hubble constant H_0. We show that present data weakly constrain (w_0,w_a) around the values corresponding to a cosmological constant, i.e. (w_0,w_a) = (-1,0). Cluster data alone prefer low values of the amplitude of mass fluctuations, sigma_8 < 0.69 (1 sigma C.L.), and large amounts of nonrelativistic matter, Omega_m > 0.38 (1 sigma C.L.), in slight tension with the LambdaCDM concordance cosmological model (the results are however compatible with LambdaCDM at 2sigma). We derive a sigma_8 normalization relation, sigma_8 Omega_m^(1/3) = 0.49 pm 0.06 (2 sigma C.L.), and we find that the fit to data is almost independent of n and only very weakly dependent on H_0. Combining cluster data with baryon acoustic oscillation observations, cosmic microwave background data, Hubble constant measurements, Hubble parameter determination from passively-evolving red galaxies, and magnitude-redshift data of type Ia supernovae, we find sigma_8 = 0.73^(+0.03)_(-0.03), Omega_m = 0.28^(+0.03)_(-0.02), w_0 = -1.14^(+0.14)_(-0.16), w_a = 0.85^(+0.42)_(-0.60), H_0 = 69.1^(+1.3)_(-1.5) km/s/Mpc (all 1 sigma C.L. errors), in substantial agreement with the concordance cosmological model. Very similar results are found in the case of time-evolving dark energy with a constant equation-of-state parameter w = const (the XCDM parametrization). Finally, we show that the impact of bounds on (w_0,w_a) is to favor top-down phantom models of evolving dark energy.
Source arXiv, 1110.2310
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica