|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609
26 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
The afterglow of GRB021211: Another case of reverse shock emission | | D.M. Wei
; | | Date: |
17 Dec 2002 | | Journal: | Astron.Astrophys. 402 (2003) L9 | | Subject: | astro-ph | | Affiliation: | Purple Mountain Observatory, China | | Abstract: | GRB021211 was first detected by HETE II and its early afterglow has been observed. There is a break in its afterglow light curve at about 12 minutes after the bursts, before the break the optical flux decays with a power-law index of about -1.6, while at late time the power-law slope is about -1 (Chornock et al. 2002). Here we will show that the afterglow light curve of GRB021211 can be explained within the framework of the standard fireball model. We show that the afterglow emission before the break time is the contribution of the emission from both the reverse shock and the forward shock, while the afterglow emission after the break time is mainly due to the forward shock emission. From the fitting we can give constraints on the parameters: the initial Lorentz factor $250leq gamma_0 leq 900$, the surrounding medium density $ngeq 1.6 imes 10^{-3}$ atoms ${
m cm^{-3}}$, and $0.077epsilon_{
m B}^{3/16} leq epsilon_{
m B}^{1/4}(frac{epsilon_{
m e}}{0.1}) leq 0.14$, where $epsilon_{
m B}$ and $epsilon_{
m e}$ are the fractions of the shock energy given to the magnetic field and electrons. We propose that since the values of $epsilon_{
m B}$ and $epsilon_{
m e}$ are somewhat smaller for GRB021211, so the peak energy of the reverse shock emission is well below the optical band, and thus it is substantially fainter than 990123 at similar epochs. Also we suggest that such a break might be a common feature in early optical afterglows. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0301345 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER