| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
20 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Galaxy morphology to I=25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field | R. G. Abraham
; N. R. Tanvir
; B. X. Santiago
; R. S. Ellis
; K. Glazebrook
; S. van den Bergh
; | Date: |
9 Feb 1996 | Subject: | astro-ph | Abstract: | The morphological properties of galaxies between $21 {
m~mag} < I < 25 {
m~mag}$ in the {em Hubble Deep Field} are investigated using a quantitative classification system based on measurements of the central concentration and asymmetry of galaxian light. The class distribution of objects in the {em Hubble Deep Field} is strongly skewed towards highly asymmetric objects, relative to distributions from both the {em HST Medium Deep Survey} at $I < 22 {
m~mag}$ and an artificially redshifted sample of local galaxies. The steeply rising number count-magnitude relation for irregular/peculiar/merging systems at $I < 22 {~
m mag}$ reported in Glazebrook etal (1995a) continues to at least $I=25~{
m mag}$. Although these peculiar systems are predominantly blue at optical wavelengths, a significant fraction also exhibit red $U-B$ colours, which may indicate they are at high redshift. Beyond Glazebrook etal ’s magnitude limit the spiral counts appear to rise more steeply than high-normalization no-evolution predictions, whereas those of elliptical/S0 galaxies only slightly exceed such predictions and may turn-over beyond $I sim 24~{
m mag}$. These results are compared with those from previous investigations of faint galaxy morphology with HST and the possible implications are briefly discussed. The large fraction of peculiar/irregular/merging systems in the {em Hubble Deep Field} suggests that by $Isim 25 {
m~mag}$ the conventional Hubble system no longer provides an adequate description of the morphological characteristics of a high fraction of field galaxies. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/9602044 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |