| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3665 Articles: 2'599'751 Articles rated: 2609
26 January 2025 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Origins of Mass | Frank Wilczek
; | Date: |
29 Jun 2012 | Abstract: | Newtonian mechanics posited mass as a primary quality of matter, incapable of
further elucidation. We now see Newtonian mass as an emergent property. Most of
the mass of standard matter, by far, arises dynamically, from back-reaction of
the color gluon fields of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). The equations for
massless particles support extra symmetries - specifically scale, chiral, and
gauge symmetries. The consistency of the standard model relies on a high degree
of underlying gauge and chiral symmetry, so the observed non-zero masses of
many elementary particles ($W$ and $Z$ bosons, quarks, and leptons) requires
spontaneous symmetry breaking. Superconductivity is a prototype for spontaneous
symmetry breaking and for mass-generation, since photons acquire mass inside
superconductors. A conceptually similar but more intricate form of
all-pervasive (i.e. cosmic) superconductivity, in the context of the
electroweak standard model, gives us a successful, economical account of $W$
and $Z$ boson masses. It also allows a phenomenologically successful, though
profligate, accommodation of quark and lepton masses. The new cosmic
superconductivity, when implemented in a straightforward, minimal way, suggests
the existence of a remarkable new particle, the so-called Higgs particle. The
mass of the Higgs particle itself is not explained in the theory, but appears
as a free parameter. Earlier results suggested, and recent observations at the
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may indicate, the actual existence of the Higgs
particle, with mass $m_H approx 125$ GeV. In addition to consolidating our
understanding of the origin of mass, a Higgs particle with $m_H approx 125$
GeV could provide an important clue to the future, as it is consistent with
expectations from supersymmetry. | Source: | arXiv, 1206.7114 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser CCBot/2.0 (https://commoncrawl.org/faq/)
|
| |
|
|
|