Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

18 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0309068

 Article overview


Photometric Redshifts for Galaxies in the GOODS Southern Field
B. Mobasher ; R. Idzi ; N. Benitez ; A. Cimatti ; S. Cristiani ; E. Daddi ; T. Dahlen ; M. Dickinson ; T. Erben ; H. C. Ferguson ; M. Giavalisco ; N. A. Grogin ; A. M. Koekemoer ; M. Mignoli ; L. A. Moustakas ; M. Nonino ; P. Rosati ; M. Schirmer ; D. Stern ; E. Vanzella ; C. Wolf ; G. Zamorani STScI JHU Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste ESO Bonn Osservatorio Astrofisico di Bologna JPL Oxford ;
Date 2 Sep 2003
Journal Astrophys.J. 600 (2004) L167-L170
Subject astro-ph
AbstractWe use extensive multi-wavelength photometric data from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) to estimate photometric redshifts for a sample of 434 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts in the Chandra Deep Field South. Using the Bayesian method, which incorporates redshift/magnitude priors, we estimate photometric redshifts for galaxies in the range 18 < R (AB) < 25.5, giving an rms scatter of 0.11. The outlier fraction is < 10%, with the outlier-clipped rms being 0.047. We examine the accuracy of photometric redshifts for several, special sub--classes of objects. The results for extremely red objects are more accurate than those for the sample as a whole, with rms of 0.051 and very few outliers (3%). Photometric redshifts for active galaxies, identified from their X-ray emission, have a dispersion of 0.104, with 10% outlier fraction, similar to that for normal galaxies. Employing a redshift/magnitude prior in this process seems to be crucial in improving the agreement between photometric and spectroscopic redshifts.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0309068
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica