Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'501'711
Articles rated: 2609

19 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1309.2642

 Article overview


Do gravitational lens galaxies have an excess of luminous substructure?
A. M. Nierenberg ; D. Oldenburg ; T. Treu ;
Date 10 Sep 2013
AbstractStrong gravitational lensing can be used to directly measure the mass function of their satellites, thus testing one of the fundamental predictions of cold dark matter cosmological models. Given the importance of this test it is essential to ensure that galaxies acting as strong lenses have dark and luminous satellites which are representative of the overall galaxy population. We address this issue by measuring the number and spatial distribution of luminous satellites in ACS imaging around lens galaxies from the Sloan Lens Advanced Camera for Surveys (SLACS) lenses, and comparing them with the satellite population in ACS imaging of non lens galaxies selected from COSMOS, which has similar depth and resolution to the ACS images of SLACS lenses. In order to compare the samples of lens and non lens galaxies, which have intrinsically different stellar mass distributions, we measure, for the first time, the number of satellites per host as a continuous function of host stellar mass for both populations. We find that the number of satellites as a function of host stellar mass, as well as the spatial distribution are consistent between the samples. Using these results, we predict the number of satellites we would expect to find around a subset of the Cosmic Lens All Sky Survey (CLASS) lenses, and find a result consistent with the the number observed by Jackson et al. 2010. Thus we conclude that within our measurement uncertainties there is no significant difference in the satellite populations of lens and non lens galaxies.
Source arXiv, 1309.2642
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica