| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'500'096 Articles rated: 2609
18 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Hamiltonian for coupled flux qubits | Alec Maassen van den Brink
; | Date: |
17 Oct 2003 | Journal: | Phys. Rev. B_71_, 064503 (2005) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.064503 | Subject: | Mesoscopic Systems and Quantum Hall Effect; Superconductivity | cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con | Abstract: | An effective Hamiltonian is derived for two coupled three-Josephson-junction (3JJ) qubits. This is not quite trivial, for the customary "free" 3JJ Hamiltonian is written in the limit of zero inductance L. Neglecting the self-flux is already dubious for one qubit when it comes to readout, and becomes untenable when discussing inductive coupling. First, inductance effects are analyzed for a single qubit. For small L, the self-flux is a "fast variable" which can be eliminated adiabatically. However, the commonly used junction phases are_not_ appropriate "slow variables", and instead one introduces degrees of freedom which are decoupled from the loop current to leading order. In the quantum case, the zero-point fluctuations (LC oscillations) in the loop current diverge as L->0. Fortunately, they merely renormalize the Josephson couplings of the effective (two-phase) theory. In the coupled case, the strong zero-point fluctuations render the full (six-phase) wave function significantly entangled in leading order. However, in going to the four-phase theory, this uncontrollable entanglement is integrated out completely, leaving a computationally usable mutual-inductance term of the expected form as the effective interaction. | Source: | arXiv, cond-mat/0310425 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser claudebot
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |