Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

18 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9611219

 Article overview


Optical and infrared investigation towards the z=3.8 quasar pair PC1643+4631A&B
Richard Saunders ; Joanne C. Baker ; Malcolm N. Bremer ; Andrew J. Bunker ; Garret Cotter ; Steve Eales ; Keith Grainge ; Toby Haynes ; Michael E. Jones ; Mark Lacy ; Guy Pooley ; Steve Rawlings ;
Date 26 Nov 1996
Subject astro-ph
Affiliation MRAO Cambridge UK, Leiden Observatory, Oxford, Cardiff
AbstractIn a companion paper (Paper I: Jones et al. 1996) we report the discovery of a cosmic microwave background decrement, indicative of a distant cluster with mass ~10^{15} solar masses, towards the quasar pair PC1643+4631A&B (z=3.79,3.83, separation 198’’). To search for the cluster responsible, we have obtained R-, J- and K-band images of the field and have also carried out optical spectroscopy of selected objects in it. No such cluster is evident in these images. Assuming the cluster causing the decrement is similar to massive clusters already known, our magnitude limits imply that it must lie about or beyond z=1. This provides independent support for the X-ray-based distance argument of Paper I. The cluster must gravitationally lens objects behind it; for a cluster z around 1-2, the Einstein-ring radius for sources at z ~= 3.8 is ~ 100’’. Simple modelling, producing simultaneously the S-Z effect and the lensing, shows that the source positions of quasars A and B lie within ~10’’ of each other and may indeed be coincident. The two quasar spectra are found to be remarkably similar apart from their one-percent redshift difference. Assuming A and B are images of a single quasar, we present a possible explanation of this difference.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9611219
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica