|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609
19 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Do We Need More Training Data? | | Xiangxin Zhu
; Carl Vondrick
; Charless Fowlkes
; Deva Ramanan
; | | Date: |
5 Mar 2015 | | Abstract: | Datasets for training object recognition systems are steadily increasing in
size. This paper investigates the question of whether existing detectors will
continue to improve as data grows, or saturate in performance due to limited
model complexity and the Bayes risk associated with the feature spaces in which
they operate. We focus on the popular paradigm of discriminatively trained
templates defined on oriented gradient features. We investigate the performance
of mixtures of templates as the number of mixture components and the amount of
training data grows. Surprisingly, even with proper treatment of regularization
and "outliers", the performance of classic mixture models appears to saturate
quickly ($sim$10 templates and $sim$100 positive training examples per
template). This is not a limitation of the feature space as compositional
mixtures that share template parameters via parts and that can synthesize new
templates not encountered during training yield significantly better
performance. Based on our analysis, we conjecture that the greatest gains in
detection performance will continue to derive from improved representations and
learning algorithms that can make efficient use of large datasets. | | Source: | arXiv, 1503.1508 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER