Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'501'711
Articles rated: 2609

19 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1512.0358

 Article overview


Almost Tight Bounds for Eliminating Depth Cycles in Three Dimensions
Boris Aronov ; Micha Sharir ;
Date 1 Dec 2015
AbstractGiven $n$ non-vertical lines in 3-space, their vertical depth (above/below) relation can contain cycles. We show that the lines can be cut into $O(n^{3/2}mathop{mathrm{polylog}} n)$ pieces, such that the depth relation among these pieces is now a proper partial order. This bound is nearly tight in the worst case. As a consequence, we deduce that the number of emph{pairwise non-overlapping cycles}, namely, cycles whose $xy$-projections do not overlap, is $O(n^{3/2}mathop{mathrm{polylog}} n)$; this bound too is almost tight in the worst case.
Previous results on this topic could only handle restricted cases of the problem (such as handling only triangular cycles, by Aronov, Koltun, and Sharir, or only cycles in grid-like patterns, by Chazelle et al.), and the bounds were considerably weaker---much closer to quadratic.
Our proof uses a recent variant of the polynomial partitioning technique, due to Guth, and some simple tools from algebraic geometry. It is much more straightforward than the previous "purely combinatorial" methods.
Our technique extends to eliminating all cycles in the depth relation among segments, and of constant-degree algebraic arcs. We hope that a suitable extension of this technique could be used to handle the (much more difficult) case of pairwise-disjoint triangles. Our results almost completely settle a long-standing (35 years old) open problem in computational geometry, motivated by hidden-surface removal in computer graphics.
Source arXiv, 1512.0358
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica