Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1601.6063

 Article overview



Detection of the Splashback Radius and Halo Assembly bias of Massive Galaxy Clusters
Surhud More ; Hironao Miyatake ; Masahiro Takada ; Benedikt Diemer ; Andrey V. Kravtsov ; Neal K. Dalal ; Anupreeta More ; Ryoma Murata ; Rachel Mandelbaum ; Eduardo Rozo ; Eli S. Rykoff ; Masamune Oguri ; David N. Spergel ;
Date 22 Jan 2016
AbstractWe show that the projected number density profiles of SDSS photometric galaxies around galaxy clusters displays strong evidence for the splashback radius, a sharp halo edge corresponding to the location of the first orbital apocenter of satellite galaxies after their infall. We split the clusters into two subsamples with different mean projected radial distances of their members, $langle R_{ m mem} angle$, at fixed richness and redshift, and show that the sample with smaller $langle R_{ m mem} angle$ has a smaller ratio of the splashback radius to the traditional halo boundary $R_{ m 200m}$, than the subsample with larger $langle R_{ m mem} angle$, indicative of different mass accretion rates for the two subsamples. The same cluster samples were recently used by Miyatake et al. to show that their large-scale clustering differs despite their similar weak lensing masses, demonstrating strong evidence for halo assembly bias. We expand on this result by presenting a 6.6-$sigma$ detection of halo assembly bias using the cluster-photometric galaxy cross-correlations. Our measured splashback radii are smaller, while the strength of the assembly bias signal is stronger, than expectations from N-body simulations based on the $Lambda$-dominated, cold dark matter structure formation model. Dynamical friction or cluster-finding systematics such as miscentering or projection effects are not likely to be the sole source of these discrepancies.
Source arXiv, 1601.6063
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica