Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'501'711
Articles rated: 2609

20 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1609.0204

 Article overview


Strong constraints of LUX-2016 results on the natural NMSSM
Junjie Cao ; Yangle He ; Liangliang Shang ; Wei Su ; Peiwen Wu ; Yang Zhang ;
Date 1 Sep 2016
AbstractGiven the fact that the relatively light Higgsino mass $mu$ favored in the natural supersymmetry usually results in a sizable scattering cross section between the neutralino dark matter and the Standard Model nucleon, we study the impact of the recently updated direct detection bounds from LUX experiment, including both Spin Independent (SI) and Spin Dependent (SD) measurements, on the parameter space of natural Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (nNMSSM). Different from the common impression that the SI bound is stronger than the SD one, we find that the SD bound is complementary to the SI bound, and in some cases much more powerful than the latter, in limiting the nNMSSM scenarios. After considering the LUX results, the nNMSSM is severely limited, e.g. for the peculiar scenarios of the NMSSM where the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs corresponds to the $125, { m GeV}$ Higgs boson discovered at the LHC, the samples obtained in our random scan are excluded by more than $85\%$. By contrast, the monojet search at the LHC Run-I can not exclude any sample of the nNMSSM. We also investigate current status of the nNMSSM and conclude that, although the parameter points with low fine tuning are still attainable, they are distributed in some isolated parameter islands which are difficult to get. Future dark matter direct search experiments such as XENON-1T will provide a better test of the nNMSSM.
Source arXiv, 1609.0204
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica