|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609
25 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
A hard ionizing spectrum in z=3-4 Ly-alpha emitters with intense [OIII] emission: Analogs of galaxies in the reionization era? | | Kimihiko Nakajima
; Richard S. Ellis
; Ikuru Iwata
; Akio Inoue
; Haruka Kusakabe
; Masami Ouchi
; Brant Robertson
; | | Date: |
29 Aug 2016 | | Abstract: | We present Keck/MOSFIRE spectra of the diagnostic nebular emission lines
[OIII]5007,4959, [OII]3727, and H-beta for a sample of 15 redshift z=3.1-3.7
Ly-alpha emitters (LAEs) and Lyman break galaxies (LBGs). In conjunction with
spectra from other surveys, we confirm earlier indications that LAEs have a
much higher [OIII]/[OII] line ratio than is seen in similar redshift LBGs. By
comparing their distributions on a [OIII]/[OII] versus R23 diagram, we
demonstrate that this difference cannot arise solely because of their lower
metallicities but most likely is due to a harder ionizing spectrum. Using
measures of H-beta and recombination theory, we demonstrate, for a subset of
our LAEs, that xi_ion - the number of Lyman continuum photons per UV luminosity
- is indeed 0.2-0.5 dex larger than for typical LBGs at similar redshifts.
Using photoionization models we estimate the effect this would have on both
[OIII]/[OII] and R23 and conclude such a hard spectrum can only partially
explain such intense line emission. The additional possibility is that such a
large [OIII]/[OII] ratio is in part due to density rather than ionization bound
nebular regions, which would imply a high escape fraction of ionizing photons.
We discuss how further observations could confirm this possibility. Clearly
LAEs with intense [OIII] emission represent a promising analog of those z>7
sources with similarly strong lines which are thought to be an important
contributor to cosmic reionization. | | Source: | arXiv, 1608.8222 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER