forgot password?
register here
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
Members: 3286
Articles: 2'244'908
Articles rated: 2592

19 August 2022
  » arxiv » 1702.8562

 Article overview

A Kennicutt-Schmidt relation at molecular cloud scales and beyond
Sergey A. Khoperskov ; Evgenii O. Vasiliev ;
Date 27 Feb 2017
AbstractUsing N-body/gasdynamic simulations of a Milky Way-like galaxy we analyse a Kennicutt-Schmidt relation, $Sigma_{SFR} propto Sigma_{gas}^N$, at different spatial scales. We simulate synthetic observations in CO lines and UV band. We adopt the star formation rate defined in two ways: based on free fall collapse of a molecular cloud - $Sigma_{SFR, cl}$, and calculated by using a UV flux calibration - $Sigma_{SFR, UV}$. We study a KS relation for spatially smoothed maps with effective spatial resolution from molecular cloud scales to several hundred parsecs. We find that for spatially and kinematically resolved molecular clouds the $Sigma_{SFR, cl} propto Sigma_{ m gas}^N$ relation follows the power-law with index $N approx 1.4$. Using UV flux as SFR calibrator we confirm a systematic offset between the $Sigma_{ m UV}$ and $Sigma_{ m gas}$ distributions on scales compared to molecular cloud sizes. Degrading resolution of our simulated maps for surface densities of gas and star formation rates we establish that there is no relation $Sigma_{ m SFR, UV} - Sigma_{ m gas}$ below the resolution $sim 50$ pc. We find a transition range around scales $sim 50-120$ pc, where the power-law index $N$ increases from 0 to 1-1.8 and saturates for scales larger $sim 120$ pc. A value of the index saturated depends on a surface gas density threshold and it becomes steeper for higher $Sigma_{gas}$ threshold. Averaging over scales with size of $>150$ pc the power-law index $N$ equals 1.3-1.4 for surface gas density threshold $sim 5 M_odot$pc$^{-2}$. At scales $>120$ pc surface SFR densities determined by using CO data and UV flux, $Sigma_{ m SFR, UV}/Sigma_{ m SFR, cl}$, demonstrate a discrepancy about a factor of 3. We argue that this may be originated from overestimating (constant) values of conversion factor, star formation efficiency or UV calibration used in our analysis.
Source arXiv, 1702.8562
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
of broad interest:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser CCBot/2.0 (
» my Online CV
» Free

News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2022 - Scimetrica