| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
20 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Testing Radiatively-Inefficient Accretion Flow Theory: an XMM-Newton Observation of NGC 3998 | A. Ptak
; Y. Terashima
; L.C. Ho
; E. Quataert
; | Date: |
24 Dec 2003 | Journal: | Astrophys.J. 606 (2004) 173-184 | Subject: | astro-ph | Abstract: | We present the results of a 10 ks XMM-Newton observation of NGC 3998, a ``type-I’’ LINER galaxy. Our goal is to test the extent to which radiatively-inefficient accretion flow (RIAF) models and/or scaled-down AGN models are consistent with the observed properties of NGC 3998. The upper-limit for narrow Fe-K emission derived from a combined fit of the XMM-Newton and BeppoSAX spectra is 25 eV, which is one of the strictest limits to date for any AGN. This significantly rules out Fe-K emission as is expected to be observed in typical Seyfert 1 galaxies. The lack of any reflection features suggests that any optically-thick, geometrically-thin accretion disk must be truncated, probably at a radius of order 100-300 R_s. RIAF models fit the UV to X-ray spectral energy distribution of NGC 3998 reasonably well. In these models the mid-IR flux also constrains the emission from any outer thin disk component that might be present. The UV to X-ray SED is also consistent with a Comptonized thin disk with a very low accretion rate, in which case the lack of Fe-K emission may be due to an ionized accretion disk. Accretion models in general do not account for the observed radio flux of NGC 3998, and the radio flux may be due to a jet. Recent jet models may also be consistent with the nuclear fluxes of NGC 3998 in general, including the X-ray, optical/UV and mid-IR bands. We also derive nuclear fluxes using archival HST WFPC2 data to constrain the SED of NGC 3998. We discuss a possible OM U band and USNO-B detection of the NGC 3998 ULX. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0401524 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |