| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
19 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Near-Infrared Survey and Photometric Redshifts in the Extended GOODS-North field | Li-Ting Hsu
; Lihwai Lin
; Mark Dickinson
; Haojing Yan
; Hsieh Bau-Ching
; Wei-Hao Wang
; Chien-Hsiu Lee
; Chi-Hung Yan
; Douglas Scott
; S. P. Willner
; Masami Ouchi
; Matthew L. N. Ashby
; Yi-Wen Chen
; Emanuele Daddi
; David Elbaz
; Giovanni G. Fazio
; Sebastien Foucaud
; Jiasheng Huang
; David C. Koo
; Glenn Morrison
; Frazer Owen
; Maurilio Pannella
; Alexendra Pope
; Luc Simard
; Shiang-Yu Wang
; | Date: |
31 Dec 2018 | Abstract: | We present deep $J$ and $H$-band images in the extended Great Observatories
Origins Deep Survey-North (GOODS-N) field covering an area of 0.22
$
m{deg}^{2}$. The observations were taken using WIRCam on the 3.6-m Canada
France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). Together with the reprocessed $K_{
m s}$-band
image, the $5sigma$ limiting AB magnitudes (in 2" diameter apertures) are
24.7, 24.2, and 24.4 AB mag in the $J$, $H$, and $K_{
m s}$ bands,
respectively. We also release a multi-band photometry and photometric redshift
catalog containing 93598 sources. For non-X-ray sources, we obtained a
photometric redshift accuracy $sigma_{mathrm{NMAD}}=0.036$ with an outlier
fraction $eta = 7.3\%$. For X-ray sources, which are mainly active galactic
nuclei (AGNs), we cross-matched our catalog with the updated 2M-CDFN X-ray
catalog from Xue et al. (2016) and found that 658 out of 683 X-ray sources have
counterparts. $GALEX$ UV data are included in the photometric redshift
computation for the X-ray sources to give $sigma_{mathrm{NMAD}} = 0.040$ with
$eta=10.5\%$. Our approach yields more accurate photometric redshift estimates
compared to previous works in this field. In particular, by adopting AGN-galaxy
hybrid templates, our approach delivers photometric redshifts for the X-ray
counterparts with fewer outliers compared to the 3D-HST catalog, which fit
these sources with galaxy-only templates. | Source: | arXiv, 1901.0013 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |