Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3643
Articles: 2'488'730
Articles rated: 2609

29 March 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1903.3092

 Article overview


Revisiting Kunitomo's Sunspot Drawings during 1835-1836 in Japan
Masashi Fujiyama ; Hisashi Hayakawa ; Tomoya Iju ; Toshiki Kawai ; Shin Toriumi ; Kenichi Otsuji ; Katsuya Kondo ; Yusaku Watanabe ; Satoshi Nozawa ; Shinsuke Imada ;
Date Thu, 7 Mar 2019 18:39:40 GMT (1818kb)
AbstractWe revisit the sunspot drawings made by the Japanese astronomer Kunitomo Toubei during 1835-1836 and recount the sunspot group number for each image. There are two series of drawings, preliminary (P, containing 17 days with observations) and summary (S, covering 156 days with observations), all made using brush and ink. S is a compilation of drawings for the period from February 1835, to March 1836. Presently, the P drawings are available only for one month, September 1835; those of other periods have presumably been lost. Another drawing (I) lets us recover the raw group count (RGC) for 25 September 1836, on which the RGC has not been registered in the existing catalogs. We also revise the RGCs from P and S using the Zurich classification and determine that Kunitomo’s results tend to yield smaller RGCs than those of other contemporary observers. In addition, we find that Kunitomo’s RGCs and spot areas have a correlation (0.71) that is not very different from the contemporary observer Schwabe (0.82). Although Kunitomo’s spot areas are much larger than those determined by Schwabe due to skill and instrument limitations, Kunitomo at least captured the growing trend of the spot activity in the early phase of the Solar Cycle 8. We also determine the solar rotation axis to estimate the accurate position (latitude and longitude) of the sunspot groups in Kunitomo’s drawings.
Source arXiv, 1903.3092
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica