Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3644
Articles: 2'497'992
Articles rated: 2609

16 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1903.9048

 Article overview


The Type II-P Supernova 2017eaw: from explosion to the nebular phase
Tamás Szalai ; József Vinkó ; Réka Könyves-Tóth ; Andrea P. Nagy ; K. Azalee Bostroem ; Krisztián Sárneczky ; Peter J. Brown ; Ondrej Pejcha ; Attila Bódi ; Borbála Cseh ; Géza Csörnyei ; Zoltán Dencs ; Ottó Hanyecz ; Bernadett Ignácz ; Csilla Kalup ; Levente Kriskovics ; András Ordasi ; András Pál ; Bálint Seli ; Ádám Sódor ; Róbert Szakáts ; Krisztián Vida ; Gabriella Zsidi ; Iair Arcavi ; Chris Ashall ; Jamison Burke ; Lluís Galbany ; Daichi Hiramatsu ; Griffin Hosseinzadeh ; Eric Y. Hsiao ; D. Andrew Howell ; Curtis McCully ; Shane Moran ; Jeonghee Rho ; David J. Sand ; Melissa Shahbandeh ; Stefano Valenti ; Xiaofeng Wang ; J. Craig Wheeler ;
Date 21 Mar 2019
AbstractThe nearby SN 2017eaw is a Type II-P (’’plateau’) supernova showing early-time, moderate CSM interaction. We present a comprehensive study of this SN including the analysis of high-quality optical photometry and spectroscopy covering the very early epochs up to the nebular phase, as well as near-UV and near-infrared spectra, and early-time X-ray and radio data. The combined data of SNe 2017eaw and 2004et allow us to get an improved distance to the host galaxy, NGC 6946, as $D sim 6.85$ $pm 0.63$ Mpc; this fits in recent independent results on the distance of the host and disfavors the previously derived (30% shorter) distances based on SN 2004et. From modeling the nebular spectra and the quasi-bolometric light curve, we estimate the progenitor mass and some basic physical parameters for the explosion and the ejecta. Our results agree well with previous reports on a RSG progenitor star with a mass of $sim15-16$ M$_odot$. Our estimation on the pre-explosion mass-loss rate ($dot{M} sim3 imes 10^{-7} -$ $1 imes 10^{-6} M_{odot}$ yr$^{-1}$) agrees well with previous results based on the opacity of the dust shell enshrouding the progenitor, but it is orders of magnitude lower than previous estimates based on general light-curve modeling of Type II-P SNe. Combining late-time optical and mid-infrared data, a clear excess at 4.5 $mu$m can be seen, supporting the previous statements on the (moderate) dust formation in the vicinity of SN 2017eaw.
Source arXiv, 1903.9048
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica