|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609
24 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Star-forming clumps in the Lyman Alpha Reference Sample of galaxies -- I. Photometric analysis and clumpiness | | Matteo Messa
; Angela Adamo
; Göran Östlin
; Jens Melinder
; Matthew Hayes
; Johanna S. Bridge
; John Cannon
; | | Date: |
11 Jun 2019 | | Abstract: | We study young star-forming clumps on physical scales of 10-500 pc in the
Lyman-Alpha Reference Sample (LARS), a collection of low-redshift (z =
0.03-0.2) UV-selected star-forming galaxies. In each of the 14 galaxies of the
sample, we detect clumps for which we derive sizes and magnitudes in 5
UV-optical filters. The final sample includes $sim$1400 clumps, of which
$sim$600 have magnitude uncertainties below 0.3 in all filters. The UV
luminosity function for the total sample of clumps is described by a power-law
with slope $alpha = -2.03^{+0.11}_{-0.13}$. Clumps in the LARS galaxies have
on average $Sigma_{SFR}$ values higher than what observed in HII regions of
local galaxies and comparable to typical SFR densities of clumps in z = 1-3
galaxies. We derive the clumpiness as the relative contribution from clumps to
the UV emission of each galaxy, and study it as a function of galactic-scale
properties, i.e. $Sigma_{SFR}$ and the ratio between rotational and dispersion
velocities of the gas ($v_s/sigma_0$). We find that in galaxies with higher
$Sigma_{SFR}$ or lower $v_s/sigma_0$, clumps dominate the UV emission of
their host systems. All LARS galaxies with Ly$alpha$ escape fractions larger
than 10% have more than 50% of the UV luminosity from clumps. We tested the
robustness of these results against the effect of different physical
resolutions. At low resolution, the measured clumpiness appears more elevated
than if we could resolve clumps down to single clusters. This effect is small
in the redshift range covered by LARS, thus our results are not driven by the
physical resolution. | | Source: | arXiv, 1906.4751 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER