| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'504'585 Articles rated: 2609
24 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Too heavy to be moved | Fan Si
; Xiao-Long Chen
; Long Zhou
; Yi-Fei Zhang
; Sheng-Hui Zhang
; Xin-Yue Ju
; Xiu-Jun Li
; Xin Dong
; Nu Xu
; | Date: |
21 Jun 2019 | Abstract: | We present a study of beauty and charm isolation based on a data driven
method with recent heavy flavor hadrons and their decay electron measurements
in Au+Au collisions at $sqrt{s_{
m NN}}$ = 200 GeV at RHIC. The individual
electron transverse momentum spectra, $R_{
m AA}$ and $v_2$ distributions from
charm and beauty decays are obtained. We found that the electron $R_{
m AA}$
from beauty decays ($R_{
m AA}^{
m b
ightarrow e}$) are suppressed in
minimum bias Au+Au collisions but less suppressed compared with that from charm
decays at $p_T$ $>$ 3.5 GeV/$c$, which indicates that beauty interacts with the
hot-dense medium with depositing its energy and is consistent with the
mass-dependent energy loss scenario. And the first time, the non-zero electron
$v_2$ from beauty decays ($v_{2}^{
m b
ightarrow e}$) at $p_T$ $>$ 3.0
GeV/$c$ is observed and shows smaller flow compared with that from charm decays
at $p_T$ $<$ 4.0 GeV/$c$. At 2.5 $<$ $p_T$ $<$ 4.5 GeV/$c$, $v_{2}^{
m
b
ightarrow e}$ is smaller than a number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling
hypothesis, which indicates that beauty quark is unlikely thermalized and too
heavy to be moved in a partonic collectivity in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC
energy. | Source: | arXiv, 1906.8974 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |