Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0409391

 Article overview



The Zone of Avoidance: Optical Compared to Near-Infrared Searches
Renee C. Kraan-Korteweg ; Thomas Jarrett ;
Date 16 Sep 2004
Subject astro-ph
Affiliation Dept. of Astronomy, University of Guanajuato, IPAC, Caltech
AbstractGalaxies uncovered in the Zone of Avoidance (ZOA) with deep optical searches are compared to the distribution of objects in the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog (2MASX). While the galaxy density of optical surveys is strongly correlated to the dust content, and become ineffective in uncovering the galaxy distribution at A_B > 3.0 mag, this effect is much less severe in the NIR. Galaxies can be identified in 2MASS at optical extinction layers of over 10mag. However, star density has been found to be the dominant limiting factor in the NIR in the wider Galactic Bulge region (see Fig. 4) where optical surveys still do quite well. Systematic positional offsets have also been found between objects in the 2MASX and the optical ZOA as well as other galaxy catalogs. These seem to have their origin in the astrometric reference frame used by these surveys as well as different fitting algorithms when determining positions (details are given in the Appendix). The astrometric offsets between 2MASX and more recent galaxy catalogs (or on the Digitized Sky Survey remeasured positions) are of the order of 1 - 1.5 arcsec, comparable to the relative dispersion in positions between these surveys. Still, it is advisable to take this effect into account when combining galaxies from different catalogs for observational purposes.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0409391
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica