Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

19 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1910.7937

 Article overview


A pair of quasirandom estimations of two-qubit separability probabilities with respect to ten measures -- the Hilbert-Schmidt and nine operator monotone ones
Paul B. Slater ;
Date 17 Oct 2019
AbstractWe conduct a pair of quasirandom estimations of the separability probabilities with respect to ten measures on the 15-dimensional convex set of two-qubit states, using its Euler-angle parameterization. The measures include the (non-monotone) Hilbert-Schmidt one, plus nine based on operator monotone functions. Our results are supportive of previous assertions that the Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures (minimal monotone) separability probabilities are $frac{8}{33} approx 0.242424$ and $frac{25}{341} approx 0.0733138$, respectively, as well as suggestive of the Wigner-Yanase counterpart being $frac{1}{20}$. However, they appear inconsistent (much too small) with the additional claim that the separability probability associated with the operator monotone (geometric-mean) function $sqrt{x}$ is $1-frac{256}{27 pi ^2} approx 0.0393251$. But a seeming explanation for this phenomenon is that the volume of states for the $sqrt{x}$-based measure is infinite, so the validity of the conjecture--as well as an alternative one, $frac{1}{9} left(593-60 pi ^2 ight) approx 0.0915262$, we now introduce--can not be examined through our numerical approach, at least perhaps not without some truncation procedure for extreme values.
Source arXiv, 1910.7937
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica