| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
20 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
A Precise Analytical Approximation for the Deprojection of the S'ersic Profile | Eduardo Vitral
; Gary A. Mamon
; | Date: |
Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:33:39 GMT (1857kb,D) | Abstract: | The S’ersic model is known to fit well the surface brightness (or surface
density) profiles of elliptical galaxies and galaxy bulges, and possibly for
dwarf spheroidal galaxies and globular clusters. The deprojected density and
mass profiles are important for many astrophysical applications, in particular
for mass-orbit modeling of these systems. However, the exact deprojection
formula for the S’ersic model employs special functions not available in most
computer languages. We show that all previous analytical approximations to the
3D density profile are imprecise at low S’ersic index ($n lesssim 1.5$). We
have derived a more precise analytical approximation to the deprojected
S’ersic density profile by fitting two-dimensional 10th-order polynomials to
the differences of the logarithms of the numerical deprojection and of the
analytical approximation by Lima Neto et al. (1999, LGM) of the density profile
on one hand and of the mass profile on the other. Our LGM-based polynomial fits
have typical relative precision better than $0.2\%$ for both density and mass
profiles, for S’ersic indices $0.5 leq n leq 10$ and radii $0.001 < r/R_{
m
e} < 1000$. Our approximation is much more precise than those of LGM, Simonneau
& Prada (1999, 2004), Trujillo et al. (2002) for non-half-integer values of the
index, and of Emsellem & van de Ven (2008) for non-one-tenth-integer values
with $n lesssim 3$, and are nevertheless more than $0.2\%$ precise for larger
S’ersic indices, for both density and mass profiles. An appendix compares the
deprojected S’ersic profiles with those of the popular simple models from
Plummer (1911), Jaffe (1983), Hernquist (1990), Navarro et al. (1996), and
Einasto (1965). | Source: | arXiv, 2001.3121 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |