Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'503'724
Articles rated: 2609

23 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 2007.14950

 Article overview


Characterising the target selection pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Bright Galaxy Survey
Omar Ruiz-Macias ; Pauline Zarrouk ; Shaun Cole ; Carlton M. Baugh ; Peder Norberg ; John Lucey ; Arjun Dey ; Daniel J. Eisenstein ; Peter Doel ; Enrique Gaztañaga ; ChangHoon Hahn ; Robert Kehoe ; Ellie Kitanidis ; Martin Landriau ; Dustin Lang ; John Moustakas ; Adam D. Myers ; Francisco Prada ; Michael Schubnell ; David H. Weinberg ; M. J. Wilson ;
Date 29 Jul 2020
AbstractWe present the steps taken to produce a reliable and complete input galaxy catalogue for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (uppercase{desi}) Bright Galaxy Sample (uppercase{bgs}) using the photometric Legacy Survey uppercase{dr8} uppercase{dec}am. We analyze some of the main issues faced in the selection of targets for the uppercase{desi} uppercase{bgs}, such as star-galaxy separation, contamination by fragmented stars and bright galaxies, and completeness at low surface brightness. Our pipeline utilizes a new way to select uppercase{bgs} galaxies using {it Gaia} photometry and we implement geometrical and photometric masks that reduce the number of spurious objects. The resulting catalogue is cross-matched with the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (uppercase{gama}) survey to assess the completeness of the galaxy catalogue and the performance of the target selection. We also validate the clustering of our uppercase{bgs} catalogue by comparing with mock catalogues and uppercase{sdss} data and we include a simple linear correction to the target density to mitigate the effects of stellar density systematics. The systematic variations are at most $7$ per cent before applying any weighting correction and less than $3$ per cent after a linear weight correction. Eventually, the uppercase{bgs} selection criteria is also assessed by measuring the correlation of the target galaxy density field with systematic properties of the imaging.
Source arXiv, 2007.14950
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica