Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 2008.06623

 Article overview


The supermassive black hole masses of reverberation-mapped active galactic nuclei
Li-Ming Yu ; Wei-Hao Bian ; Xue-Guang Zhang ; Bi-Xuan Zhao ; Chan Wang ; Xue Ge ; Bing-Qian Zhu ; Yu-Qin Chen ;
Date 15 Aug 2020
AbstractUsing different kinds of velocity tracers derived from the broad H$eta$ profile (in the mean or rms spectrum) and the corresponding virial factors $f$, the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses ($M_{ m BH}$) are calculated for a compiled sample of 120 reverberation-mapped (RM) AGNs. For its subsample of RM AGNs with measured stellar velocity dispersion ($sigma_{ m ast}$), the multivariate linear regression technique is used to calibrate the mean value $f$, as well as the variable FWHM-based $f$. It is found that, whether excluding the pseudo-bulges or not, $M_{ m BH}$ from the H$eta$ line dispersion in the mean spectrum ($sigma_{ m Heta,mean}$) has the smallest offset rms with respect to the $M_{ m BH}-sigma_{ast}$ relation. For the total sample excluding SDSS-RM AGNs, with respect to $M_{ m BH}$ from $sigma_{ m ast}$ or that from the H$eta$ line dispersion in the rms spectrum ($sigma_{ m Heta,rms}$), it is found that we can obtain $M_{ m BH}$ from the $sigma_{ m Heta,mean}$ with the smallest offset rms of 0.38 dex or 0.23 dex, respectively. It implies that, with respect to the H$eta$ FWHM, we prefer $sigma_{ m Heta,mean}$ to calculate $M_{ m BH}$ from the single-epoch spectrum. Using the FWHM-based $f$, we can improve $M_{ m BH}$ calculation from FWHM(H$eta$) and the mean $f$, with a decreased offset rms from 0.52 dex to 0.39 dex with respect to $M_{ m BH}$ from $sigma_{ m ast}$ for the subsample of 36 AGNs with $sigma_{ m ast}$. The value of 0.39 dex is almost the same as that from $sigma_{ m Heta,mean}$ and the mean $f$.
Source arXiv, 2008.06623
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica