| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'504'585 Articles rated: 2609
24 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
The supermassive black hole masses of reverberation-mapped active galactic nuclei | Li-Ming Yu
; Wei-Hao Bian
; Xue-Guang Zhang
; Bi-Xuan Zhao
; Chan Wang
; Xue Ge
; Bing-Qian Zhu
; Yu-Qin Chen
; | Date: |
15 Aug 2020 | Abstract: | Using different kinds of velocity tracers derived from the broad H$eta$
profile (in the mean or rms spectrum) and the corresponding virial factors $f$,
the central supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses ($M_{
m BH}$) are calculated
for a compiled sample of 120 reverberation-mapped (RM) AGNs. For its subsample
of RM AGNs with measured stellar velocity dispersion ($sigma_{
m ast}$), the
multivariate linear regression technique is used to calibrate the mean value
$f$, as well as the variable FWHM-based $f$. It is found that, whether
excluding the pseudo-bulges or not, $M_{
m BH}$ from the H$eta$ line
dispersion in the mean spectrum ($sigma_{
m Heta,mean}$) has the smallest
offset rms with respect to the $M_{
m BH}-sigma_{ast}$ relation. For the
total sample excluding SDSS-RM AGNs, with respect to $M_{
m BH}$ from
$sigma_{
m ast}$ or that from the H$eta$ line dispersion in the rms
spectrum ($sigma_{
m Heta,rms}$), it is found that we can obtain $M_{
m
BH}$ from the $sigma_{
m Heta,mean}$ with the smallest offset rms of 0.38
dex or 0.23 dex, respectively. It implies that, with respect to the H$eta$
FWHM, we prefer $sigma_{
m Heta,mean}$ to calculate $M_{
m BH}$ from the
single-epoch spectrum. Using the FWHM-based $f$, we can improve $M_{
m BH}$
calculation from FWHM(H$eta$) and the mean $f$, with a decreased offset rms
from 0.52 dex to 0.39 dex with respect to $M_{
m BH}$ from $sigma_{
m ast}$
for the subsample of 36 AGNs with $sigma_{
m ast}$. The value of 0.39 dex is
almost the same as that from $sigma_{
m Heta,mean}$ and the mean $f$. | Source: | arXiv, 2008.06623 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |