Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'500'096
Articles rated: 2609

18 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » math.QA/0403322

 Article overview


Conformal Orbifold Theories and Braided Crossed G-Categories
Michael Mueger ;
Date 19 Mar 2004
Subject Quantum Algebra; Category Theory; Operator Algebras MSC-class: 81T40; 18D10 | math.QA math.CT math.OA
AbstractWe show that a quantum field theory A living on the line and having a group G of inner symmetries gives rise to a category GLoc A of twisted representations. This category is a braided crossed G-category in the sense of Turaev. Its degree zero subcategory is braided and equivalent to the usual representation category Rep A. Combining this with [29], where Rep A was proven to be modular for a nice class of rational conformal models, and with the construction of invariants of G-manifolds in [60], we obtain an equivariant version of the following chain of constructions: Rational CFT -> modular category -> 3-manifold invariant. We then study the relation between GLoc A and the braided (in the usual sense) representation category Rep A^G of the orbifold theory A^G. We prove the equivalence Rep A^G = (GLoc A)^G, which is a rigorous implementation of the insight that one needs to take the twisted representations of A into account in order to determine Rep A^G. In the opposite direction we have GLoc A = Rep A^G times S, where S subset Rep A^G is the full subcategory of representations of A^G contained in the vacuum representation of A, and times refers to the Galois extensions of braided tensor categories of [44,48]. If A is completely rational and G is finite we prove that A has g-twisted representations for every g in G. In the holomorphic case (where Rep A = Vect_C) this allows to classify the possible categories GLoc A and to clarify the role of the twisted quantum doubles D^omega(G) in this context, as will be done in a sequel. We conclude with some remarks on non-holomorphic orbifolds and surprising counterexamples concerning permutation orbifolds.
Source arXiv, math.QA/0403322
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica