| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3643 Articles: 2'487'895 Articles rated: 2609
29 March 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Mass Renormalization in Lattice Simulations of False Vacuum Decay | Jonathan Braden
; Matthew C. Johnson
; Hiranya V. Peiris
; Andrew Pontzen
; Silke Weinfurtner
; | Date: |
25 Apr 2022 | Abstract: | False vacuum decay, a quantum mechanical first-order phase transition in
scalar field theories, is an important phenomenon in early universe cosmology.
Recently, a new real-time semi-classical technique based on ensembles of
lattice simulations was introduced to describe false vacuum decay. In this
context, or any other lattice simulation, the effective potential experienced
by long-wavelength modes is not the same as the bare potential. To make
quantitative predictions using the real-time semi-classical techniques, it is
therefore necessary to understand the redefinition of model parameters and the
corresponding deformation of the vacuum state, as well as stochastic
contributions that require modeling of unresolved subgrid modes. In this work,
we focus on the former corrections and compute the expected modification of the
true and false vacuum effective mass, which manifests as a modified dispersion
relationship for linear fluctuations about the vacuum. We compare these
theoretical predictions to numerical simulations and find excellent agreement.
Motivated by this, we use the effective masses to fix the shape of a
parameterized effective potential, and explore the modeling uncertainty
associated with non-linear corrections. We compute the decay rates in both the
Euclidean and real-time formalisms, finding qualitative agreement in the
dependence on the UV cutoff. These calculations further demonstrate that a
quantitative understanding of the rates requires additional corrections. | Source: | arXiv, 2204.11867 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser claudebot
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |