|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'928
Articles rated: 2609
25 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Photometric biases due to stellar blending: implications for measuring distances, constraining binarity and detecting exoplanetary transits | | L.L. Kiss
; T.R. Bedding
; | | Date: |
24 Dec 2004 | | Journal: | Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 358 (2005) 883-891 | | Subject: | astro-ph | | Abstract: | We investigate blending, binarity and photometric biases in crowded-field CCD imaging. For this, we consider random blend losses, which correspond to the total number of stars left undetected in unresolved blends. We present a simple formula to estimate blend losses, which can be converted to apparent magnitude biases using the luminosity function of the analyzed sample. Because of the used assumptions, our results give lower limits of the total bias and we show that in some cases even these limits point toward significant limitations in measuring apparent brightnesses of ``standard candle’’ stars, thus distances to nearby galaxies. A special application is presented for the OGLE-II BVI maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud. We find a previously neglected systematic bias up to 0.2-0.3 mag for faint stars (V~18.0-19.0) in the OGLE-II sample, which affects LMC distance measurements using RR Lyrae and red clump stars. We also consider the effects of intrinsic stellar correlations, i.e. binarity, via calculating two-point correlation functions for stellar fields around seven recently exploded classical novae. In two cases, for V1494 Aql and V705 Cas, the reported close optical companions seem to be physically correlated with the cataclysmic systems. Finally, we find significant blend frequencies up to 50-60% in the samples of wide-field exoplanetary surveys, which suggests that blending calculations are highly advisable to be included into the regular reduction procedure. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0501498 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER