Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0503172

 Article overview



Is the Number of Giant Arcs in LCDM Consistent With Observations?
G.L. Li ; S. Mao ; Y.P. Jing ; M. Bartelmann ; X. Kang ; M. Meneghetti ;
Date 8 Mar 2005
Subject astro-ph
AbstractWe use high-resolution N-body simulations to study the galaxy-cluster cross-sections and the abundance of giant arcs in the $Lambda$CDM model. Clusters are selected from the simulations using the friends-of-friends method, and their cross-sections for forming giant arcs are analyzed. The background sources are assumed to follow a uniform ellipticity distribution from 0 to 0.5 and to have an area identical to a circular source with diameter $1arcsec$. We find that the optical depth scales as the source redshift approximately as $ au_{1’’} = 2.25 imes 10^{-6}/[1+(zs/3.14)^{-3.42}]$ ($0.63$. The optical depth is sensitive to the source redshift, in qualitative agreement with Wambsganss et al. (2004). However, our overall optical depth appears to be only $sim$ 10% to 70% of those from previous studies. The differences can be mostly explained by different power spectrum normalizations ($sigma_8$) used and different ways of determining the $L/W$ ratio. Finite source size and ellipticity have modest effects on the optical depth. We also found that the number of highly magnified (with magnification $|mu|>10$) and ``undistorted’’ images (with $L/W<3$) is comparable to the number of giant arcs with $|mu|>10$ and $L/W>10$. We conclude that our predicted rate of giant arcs may be lower than the observed rate, although the precise `discrepancy’ is still unclear due to uncertainties both in theory and observations.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0503172
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica