Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0507372

 Article overview



Interpreting Cosmological Vacuum Decay
J. S. Alcaniz ; J. A. S. Lima ;
Date 15 Jul 2005
Journal Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 063516
Subject astro-ph gr-qc hep-ph hep-th
AffiliationObservatorio Nacional - MCT), J. A. S. Lima (Univ. de Sao Paulo
AbstractThe cosmological vacuum decay scenario recently proposed by Wang and Meng cite{wm} is rediscussed. From thermodynamic arguments it is found that the $epsilon$ parameter quantifying the vacuum decay rate must be positive in the presence of particle creation. If there is no particle creation, the proper mass of Cold Dark Matter (CDM) particles is necessarily a time dependent quantity, scaling as $m(t) = m_o a(t)^{epsilon}$. By considering the presence of baryons in the cosmological scenario, it is also shown that their dynamic effect is to alter the transition redshift $z_*$ (the redshift at which the Universe switches from decelerating to accelerating expansion), predicting values of $z_*$ compatible with current estimates based on type Ia supernova. In order to constrain the $Omega_m - epsilon$ plane, a joint statistical analysis involving the current supernovae observations, gas mass fraction measurements in galaxy clusters and CMB data is performed. At 95% c.l. it is found that the vacuum decay rate parameter lies on the interval $epsilon = 0.11 pm 0.12$). The possibility of a vacuum decay into photons is also analyzed. In this case, the energy density of the radiation fluid scales as $ ho_r = ho_{ro}a^{-4 + epsilon}$, and its temperature evolution law obeys $T(t) = T_oa(t)^{epsilon/4 - 1}$.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0507372
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica