|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'501'711
Articles rated: 2609
20 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
Unobscured QSO2: A New Class of Objects? | | A. Wolter
; I. M. Gioia
; J. P. Henry
; C. R. Mullis
; | | Date: |
3 Oct 2005 | | Subject: | astro-ph | | Affiliation: | INAF - Oss. Astr. di Brera Milano INAF-CNR IRA Bologna IfA, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu Dept. of Astronomy, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor | | Abstract: | We present in this paper optical and X-ray follow up observations for three X-ray selected objects extracted from the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole survey which is a flux-limited, completely identified survey. All three objects have X-ray luminosities in the 10^44 erg/s regime and show narrow emission lines in their optical discovery spectra, typical of QSO2 type objects. Spectroscopic data for the three QSO2 candidates, obtained with the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo, confirm the widths of the Halpha or Hbeta emission lines are less than 750 km/s. On the other hand XMM-Newton data do not show any sign of obscuration as expected for this class of objects. The X-ray spectra of the three objects are all well fit by a single power law model with Gamma~1.7 with low energy absorption fixed to the Galactic value along the line of sight to each object. Most observational evidence supports the scenario where optical and X-ray obscurations are linked, contrary to our findings. We discuss the unanticipated results of these observations, and compute the space density in soft X-ray surveys of this possibly new class of objects. Their spatial density in the ROSAT NEP survey is 2.8{+2.7 / -1.5} 10^-8 h^3 Mpc^-3 in a Lambda-CDM model with h=0.7. Unobscured QSOcandidates could go unrecognized in current X-ray surveys where the low hydrogen column density is inferred by a hardness ratio rather than a more precise X-ray spectrum measurement. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0510045 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER