| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'501'711 Articles rated: 2609
19 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
Detection of a period decrease in NN Ser with ULTRACAM: evidence for strong magnetic braking or an unseen companion? | C. S. Brinkworth
; T. R. Marsh
; V. S. Dhillon
; C. Knigge
; | Date: |
11 Oct 2005 | Affiliation: | 1,2), T. R. Marsh , V. S. Dhillon , C. Knigge ( Spitzer Science Center, California Institute of Technology; University of Southampton, UK; University of Warwick, UK; University of Sheffield, UK | Abstract: | We present results of high time resolution photometry of the eclipsing pre-cataclysmic variable NN Ser. We observed 13 primary eclipses of NN Ser using the high-speed CCD camera ULTRACAM and derived times of mid-eclipse, from fitting of light curve models, with uncertainties as low as 0.06 s. The observed rates of period change appear difficult to reconcile with any models of orbital period change. If the observed period change reflects an angular momentum loss, the average loss rate is consistent with the loss rates (via magnetic stellar wind braking) used in standard models of close binary evolution, which were derived from observations of much more massive cool stars. Observations of low-mass stars such as NN Ser’s secondary predict rates of ~100 times lower than we observe. We show that magnetic activity-driven changes in the quadrupole moment of the secondary star (Applegate, 1992) fail to explain the period change by an order of magnitude on energetic grounds, but that a light travel time effect caused by the presence of a third body in a long (~ decades) orbit around the binary could account for the observed changes in the timings of NN Ser’s mid-eclipses. We conclude that we have either observed a genuine angular momentum loss for NN Ser, in which case our observations pose serious difficulties for the theory of close binary evolution, or we have detected a previously unseen low-mass companion to the binary. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/0510331 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |