|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609
24 April 2024 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
GX 349+2 (Sco X-2): An odd-ball among the Z sources | | Erik Kuulkers
; Michiel van der Klis
; | | Date: |
23 Dec 1997 | | Subject: | astro-ph | | Affiliation: | University of Oxford) and Michiel van der Klis (University of Amsterdam | | Abstract: | We report on about 4 hrs of observations made with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer on 1997 May 2 of the low-mass X-ray binary and Z source GX 349+2 (Sco X-2). Initially the source was in the normal branch (NB), later it moved to the flaring branch (FB). In the NB the power spectra reveal a broad (FWHM ~16 Hz) noise component peaking near 9 Hz, with a fractional rms amplitude of ~3% (2-30 keV). This noise component does not resemble the strong quasi-periodic oscillations (QPO) usually seen in the NB of other Z sources. We set 95% confidence upper limits on the fractional rms of ~0.9% (2-30 keV) on any such QPO. In the FB the power spectrum showed a somewhat less broad noise component (FWHM ~11 Hz) peaking near 6 Hz with a fractional rms of ~4% (2-30 keV). We compare our results with previous reports, and find that the fast timing behaviour changes not only with position in the Z, but also as a function of the position of the Z track in the hardness-intensity diagram. By comparing GX 349+2 with the other Z and atoll sources, we conclude that GX 349+2 differs from the Z sources in various aspects and shows similarities to the behaviour seen in the bright atoll sources, such as GX 13+1 and GX 3+1. We also searched for kilo-Hertz QPO, similar to those present in other Z sources. We only found weak evidence (2.6 sigma confidence) for a QPO near 1020 Hz with FWHM ~40 Hz and fractional rms of ~1%. We note that this frequency and fractional rms are consistent with those expected and observed in the lower NB/FB of the Z sources Sco X-1, GX 17+2 and Cyg X-2. | | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/9712311 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |
REGISTER