Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3643
Articles: 2'488'730
Articles rated: 2609

29 March 2024
 
  » arxiv » quant-ph/9703012

 Article overview


Comparative Noninformativities of Quantum Priors Based on Monotone Metrics
Paul B. Slater ;
Date 7 Mar 1997
Journal Phys.Lett. A247 (1998) 1-8
Subject Quantum Physics; Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability | quant-ph physics.data-an
AffiliationUniversity of California, Santa Barbara
AbstractWe consider a family of prior probability distributions of particular interest, all being defined on the three-dimensional convex set of two-level quantum systems. Each distribution is, following recent work of Petz and Sudar, taken to be proportional to the volume element of a monotone metric on that Riemannian manifold. We apply an entropy-based test (a variant of one recently developed by Clarke) to determine which of two priors is more noninformative in nature. This involves converting them to posterior probability distributions based on some set of hypothesized outcomes of measurements of the quantum system in question. It is, then, ascertained whether or not the original relative entropy (Kullback-Leibler distance) between a pair of priors increases or decreases when one of them is exchanged with its corresponding posterior. The findings lead us to assert that the maximal monotone metric yields the most noninformative (prior) distribution and the minimal monotone (that is, the Bures) metric, the least. Our conclusions both agree and disagree, in certain respects, with ones recently reached by Hall, who relied upon a less specific test criterion than our entropy-based one.
Source arXiv, quant-ph/9703012
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica