| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3645 Articles: 2'504'585 Articles rated: 2609
24 April 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
The Progenitor of the New COMPTEL/ROSAT Supernova Remnant in Vela | Wan Chen & Neil Gehrels
; | Date: |
8 Dec 1998 | Subject: | astro-ph | Affiliation: | UMD & NASA/GSFC) & Neil Gehrels (NASA/GSFC | Abstract: | We show that (1) the newly discovered supernova remnant (SNR), GRO J0852--4642/RX J0852.0--4622, was created by a core-collapse supernova of a massive star, and (2) the same supernova event which produced the $^{44}$Ti detected by COMPTEL from this source is probably also responsible for a large fraction of the observed $^{26}$Al emission in the Vela region detected by the same instrument. The first conclusion is based on the fact that the remnant is currently expanding too slowly given its young age for it to be caused by a Type Ia supernova. If the current SNR shell expansion speed is greater than 3000 km/s, a $15 M_odot$ Type II supernova with a moderate kinetic energy exploding at about 150 pc away is favored. If the SNR expansion speed is lower than 2000 km s$^{-1}$, as derived naively from the X-ray data, a much more energetic supernova is required to have occurred at $sim250$ pc away in a dense environment at the edge of the Gum nebula. This progenitor has a preferred ejecta mass of $le10 M_odot$ and therefore, it is probably a Type Ib or Type Ic supernova. However, the required high ambient density of $n_H ge 100 cm^{-3}$ in this scenario is difficult to reconcile with the regional CO data. A combination of our estimates of the age/energetics of the new SNR and the almost perfect positional coincidence of the new SNR with the centroid of the COMPTEL $ ^{26}$Al emission feature of the Vela region strongly favors a causal connection. If confirmed, this will be the first case where both $^{44}$Ti and $^{26}$Al are detected from the same young SNR and together they can be used to select preferred theoretical core-collapse supernova models. | Source: | arXiv, astro-ph/9812154 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |