Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9902153

 Article overview



Projection effects in mass-selected galaxy-cluster samples
Katrin Reblinsky ; Matthias Bartelmann ;
Date 10 Feb 1999
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationMPA Garching
AbstractSelection of galaxy clusters by mass is now possible due to weak gravitational lensing effects. It is an important question then whether this type of selection reduces the projection effects prevalent in optically selected cluster samples. We address this question using simulated data, from which we construct synthetic cluster catalogues both with Abell’s criterion and an aperture-mass estimator sensitive to gravitational tidal effects. The signal-to-noise ratio of the latter allows to some degree to control the properties of the cluster sample. For the first time, we apply the cluster-detection algorithm proposed by Schneider to large-scale structure simulations. We find that selection of clusters through weak gravitational lensing is more reliable in terms of completeness and spurious detections. Choosing the signal-to-noise threshold appropriately, the completeness can be increased up to 100%, and the fraction of spurious detections can significantly be reduced compared to Abell-selected cluster samples. We also investigate the accuracy of mass estimates in cluster samples selected by both luminosity and weak-lensing effects. We find that mass estimates from gravitational lensing, for which we employ the zeta-statistics by Kaiser et al., are significantly more accurate than those obtained from galaxy kinematics via the virial theorem.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9902153
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica