Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3644
Articles: 2'499'343
Articles rated: 2609

16 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9910514

 Article overview


Identification of a complete sample of northern ROSAT All-Sky Survey X-ray sources. IV. Statistical analysis
J. Krautter ; F.-J. Zickgraf ; I. Appenzeller ; I. Thiering ; W. Voges ; C. Chavarria ; R. Kneer ; R. Mujica ; M.W. Pakull ; A. Serrano ; B. Ziegler ;
Date 28 Oct 1999
Subject astro-ph
AbstractWe present the statistical evaluation of a count rate and area limited complete sample of the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) comprising 674 sources. The RASS sources are located in six study areas outside the galactic plane (|b^II| >= 20 deg) and north of delta = -9 deg. The total sample contains 274 (40.7%) stars, 26 (3.9%) galaxies, 284 (42.1%) AGN, 78 (11.6%) clusters of galaxies and 12 (1.8%) unidentified sources. These percentages vary considerably between the individual study areas due to different mean hydrogen column densities N_H . For the accuracy of the RASS positions, i.e., the distance between optical source and X-ray position, a 90% error circle of about 30 arcsec has been found. Hardness and X-ray-to-optical flux ratios show in part systematic differences between the different object classes. However, since the corresponding parameter spaces overlap significantly for the different classes, an unambiguous identification on the basis of the X-ray data alone is not possible. The majority of the AGN in our sample are found at rather low redshifts with the median value of the whole sample being z_med=0.24. The median values for the individual fields vary between z_med=0.15 and z_med}=0.36. The slope of the log N-log S distributions for our AGN (-1.44 +- 0.09) is in good agreement with the euclidian slope of -1.5. The BL Lacs (with a slope of -0.72+-0.13) exhibit a much flatter distribution.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9910514
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser claudebot






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica