| | |
| | |
Stat |
Members: 3643 Articles: 2'487'895 Articles rated: 2609
29 March 2024 |
|
| | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
General theory of the modified Gutenberg-Richter law for large seismic moments | D. Sornette
; A. Sornette
; | Date: |
21 May 1999 | Journal: | Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89, N4:1121-1130 (1999) | Subject: | Statistical Mechanics | cond-mat.stat-mech | Affiliation: | CNRS/Univ. Nice and UCLA) and A. Sornette (Univ. Nice | Abstract: | The Gutenberg-Richter power law distribution of earthquake sizes is one of the most famous example illustrating self-similarity. It is well-known that the Gutenberg-Richter distribution has to be modified for large seismic moments, due to energy conservation and geometrical reasons. Several models have been proposed, either in terms of a second power law with a larger b-value beyond a cross-over magnitude, or based on a ``hard’’ magnitude cut-off or a ``soft’’ magnitude cut-off using an exponential taper. Since the large scale tectonic deformation is dominated by the very largest earthquakes and since their impact on loss of life and properties is huge, it is of great importance to constrain as much as possible the shape of their distribution. We present a simple and powerful probabilistic theoretical approach that shows that the Gamma distribution is the best model, under the two hypothesis that the Gutenberg-Richter power law distribution holds in absence of any condition (condition of criticality) and that one or several constraints are imposed, either based on conservation laws or on the nature of the observations themselves. The selection of the Gamma distribution does not depend on the specific nature of the constraint. We illustrate the approach with two constraints, the existence of a finite moment release rate and the observation of the size of a maximum earthquake in a finite catalog. Our predicted ``soft’’ maximum magnitudes compare favorably with those obtained by Kagan [1997] for the Flinn-Engdahl regionalization of subduction zones, collision zones and mid-ocean ridges. | Source: | arXiv, cond-mat/9905313 | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
browser claudebot
|
| |
|
|
|
| News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
| |