Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'503'724
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/9411082

 Article overview


Gravitational Lensing Limits on Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants
Christopher S. Kochanek ;
Date 19 Nov 1994
Journal Astrophys.J. 453 (1995) 545
Subject astro-ph
AbstractStandard $Omega_0=1$ cold dark matter (CDM) needs $0.27 < sigma_8 < 0.63$ ($2sigma$) to fit the observed number of large separation lenses, and the constraint is nearly independent of $H_0=100h^{-1}kms$ Mpc$^{-1}$. This range is strongly inconsistent with the COBE estimate of $sigma_8=(2.8pm0.2)h$. Tilting the primordial spectrum $propto k^n$ from $n=1$ to $0.3 ltorder n ltorder 0.7$, using an effective Hubble constant of $0.15 ltorder Gamma=h ltorder 0.30$, or reducing the matter density to $0.15 ltorder Omega_0 h ltorder 0.3$ either with no cosmological constant ($lambda_0=0$) or in a flat universe with a cosmological constant ($Omega_0+lambda_0=1$) can bring the lensing estimate of $sigma_8$ into agreement with the COBE estimates. The models and values for $sigma_8$ consistent with both lensing and COBE match the estimates from the local number density of clusters and correlation functions. The conclusions are insensitive to systematic errors except for the assumption that cluster core radii are singular. If clusters with $ hopropto(r^2+s^2)^{-1}$ have core radii exceeding $s = 15h^{-1}sigma_3^2$ kpc for a cluster with velocity dispersion $sigma=10^3sigma_3 kms$ then the estimates are invalid. There is, however, a fine tuning problem in making the cluster core radii large enough to invalidate the estimates of $sigma_8$ while producing several lenses that do not have central or ``odd images.’’ The estimated completeness of the current samples of lenses larger than $5parcs0$ is 20\%, because neither quasar surveys nor lens surveys are optimized to this class of lenses.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/9411082
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica