Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'503'724
Articles rated: 2609

24 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0006347

 Article overview


A survey of hard spectrum ROSAT sources 1: X-ray source catalogue
M.J. Page ; J.P.D. Mittaz ; F.J. Carrera ;
Date 24 Jun 2000
Journal Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 318 (2000) 1073
Subject astro-ph
AffiliationMSSL), J.P.D. Mittaz (MSSL), F.J. Carrera (MSSL, Ifca
AbstractWe present a catalogue of 147 serendipitous X-ray sources selected to have hard spectra (alpha < 0.5) from a survey of 188 ROSAT fields. Such sources must be the dominant contributors to the X-ray background at faint fluxes. We have used Monte Carlo simulations to verify that our technique is very efficient at selecting hard sources: the survey has > 10 times as much effective area to hard sources as it has to soft sources above a 0.5 - 2 keV flux level of 10^-14 erg/cm^2/s. The distribution of best fit spectral slopes of the hard sources suggests that a typical ROSAT hard source in our survey has a spectral slope alpha ~0. The hard sources have a steep number flux relation (dN/dS propto S^-gamma with a best fit value of gamma = 2.72 +- 0.12) and make up about 15% of all 0.5 - 2 keV sources with S > 10^-14 erg/cm^2/s. If their N(S) continues to fainter fluxes, the hard sources will comprise ~ 40% of sources with 5 10^-15 < S < 10^-14. The population of hard sources can therefore account for the harder average spectra of ROSAT sources with S < 10^-14. They probably make a strong contribution to the X-ray background at faint fluxes and could be the solution to the X-ray background spectral paradox.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0006347
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica