Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'504'585
Articles rated: 2609

25 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » astro-ph/0603738

 Article overview



Swift XRT Observations of the Afterglow of XRF 050416A
Vanessa Mangano ; Valentina La Parola ; Giancarlo Cusumano ; Teresa Mineo ; Daniele Malesani ; Jaroslaw Dyks ; Sergio Campana ; Milvia Capalbi ; Guido Chincarini ; Paolo Giommi ; Alberto Moretti ; Matteo Perri ; Patrizia Romano ; Gianpiero Tagliaferri ; David N. Burrows ; Olivier Godet ; Stephen T. Holland ; Jamie A. Kennea ; Kim L. Page ; Judith L. Racusin ; Peter W. A. Roming ; Bing Zhang ;
Date 27 Mar 2006
AbstractSwift discovered XRF 050416A with the BAT and began observing it with its narrow field instruments only 64.5 s after the burst onset. Its very soft spectrum classifies this event as an X-ray flash. The afterglow X-ray emission was monitored up to 74 days after the burst. The X-ray light curve initially decays very fast, subsequently flattens and eventually steepens again, similar to many X-ray afterglows. The first and second phases end about 172 and 1450 s after the burst onset, respectively. We find evidence of spectral evolution from a softer emission with photon index $Gamma sim 3.0$ during the initial steep decay, to a harder emission with $Gamma sim 2.0$. The spectra show intrinsic absorption in the host galaxy. The consistency of the initial photon index with the high energy BAT photon index suggests that the initial phase of the X-ray afterglow may be the low-energy tail of the prompt emission. This also requires that the spectral peak energy of the burst decreased from the time of the BAT to the time of the XRT observation, becoming as low as $simlt 1$ keV. Hardness ratio evolution during the prompt emission also supports this interpretation. The lack of jet break signatures in the X-ray afterglow light curve is not consistent with the Ghirlanda and Liang relations. The standard uniform jet model can give a possible description of the XRF 050416A X-ray afterglow for an opening angle larger than a few tens degrees, although numerical simulations show that the late time decay is slightly flatter than expected from on-axis viewing of a uniform jet. A structured Gaussian-type jet model with uniform Lorentz factor distribution and viewing angle outside the Gaussian core is another possibility although a full agreement with data is not achieved with the numerical models explored.
Source arXiv, astro-ph/0603738
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.

browser Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica